Better Dividend Stock: Procter & Gamble vs. Kimberly-Clark

Better Dividend Stock: Procter & Gamble Vs. Kimberly-Clark

Wall Street has put shares of Kimberly-Clark (NYSE: KMB ) and Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG ) on the discount aisle for 2023. The two consumer goods giants have so far sat on the bull market amid investor concerns about slowing growth trends in an uncertain economy. Investors have also been more attracted to technology stocks this year.

This decline in performance could be good news for investors looking for bargains in high-quality businesses. It's an even better development for dividend fans as the stock yields around 3% today. With these positive factors in mind, let's take a look at which company might be a better fit for your portfolio.

Market share comparison

While both companies are growing revenue at a healthy pace, P&G is more likely to appeal to investors looking for market-leading sales trends. Its organic revenue beat expectations for the second quarter in a row last quarter and rose 7% year-over-year. Kimberly-Clark posted a 5% year-over-year increase in the corresponding quarter.

P&G also achieved better sales volumes. Of course, both companies are seeing lower volumes in their product portfolios, such as laundry detergent, wipes and diapers, as consumers respond to rising prices. However, the decline in Kimberly-Clark's volume was more significant by 3% year-on-year.

P&G posted a year-over-year decline of just 1% last quarter, an improvement from a 3% decline in the previous quarter. P&G management called the performance a "very strong end to the fiscal year," which came despite unfavorable cost and consumer spending conditions.

Better margins

Investors don't have to worry about these companies trying to pass on higher costs to consumers. Today, their gross profit margins are actually rising due to price increases exceeding their own increased costs.For more than a decade, P&G's greater scale and market leadership has enabled it to generate industry-leading operating profit margins. The company now turns roughly 22% of sales into profits, compared to 14% at its smaller company. Tracking cash tells a similar story.P&G's operating cash flow is multiple times that of Kimberly-Clark and has been accelerating in recent quarters. This bodes well for shareholder returns through dividend payments and share buybacks.

Cheaper shares

Unsurprisingly, P&G's stock price is higher compared to Kimberly-Clark's, reflecting its more impressive growth profile and stronger financials. You can buy Kimberly-Clark for 2.1 times annual sales, while you'll have to pay nearly five times sales for P&G. In addition to this discount, you also get a higher dividend yield with Kimberly-Clark. At today's prices, the owner of hit brands like Kleenex and Huggies pays 3.7% a year, compared to P&G's 2.4% yield.

Investors who prefer securities and are looking for higher income may prefer shares of Kimberly-Clark. After all, the business is growing and has a good chance of increasing its profitability over the next year or so as cost inflation continues to slow.

However, growth-oriented investors who don't mind paying a premium will gravitate towards P&G. The market leader has demonstrated a knack for using innovation to expand its market share in areas such as skin care, laundry care and household cleaners.

And its smaller dividend yield is offset by other positive factors, such as its cash flow, which supports aggressive spending on dividend increases and share buybacks. Between these two quality dividend stocks, P&G appears to be worth its higher valuation.

SPONSORED BY:

When our team of analysts has a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they've been running for over a decade, the Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has tripled the marketThey just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Procter & Gamble wasn't one of them! That's right - he thinks these 10 stocks are an even better buy. 

When it comes to investing in dividend stocks, the names Procter & Gamble and Kimberly-Clark stand out as industry giants. The two consumer goods companies have a long history of rewarding their shareholders with consistent dividends. In this article, we perform a comprehensive analysis of Procter & Gamble (P&G) and Kimberly-Clark, comparing their financial performance, dividend history, and growth potential. This analysis will help investors make an informed decision about which dividend stock might be a better choice for their portfolio.

Comparison of financial performance

To assess the financial performance of both companies, let's dive into key metrics such as revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and profit margin. With its diverse portfolio of well-known brands, Procter & Gamble has consistently demonstrated robust financial results. In contrast, Kimberly-Clark, known for its personal care products and consumer tissues, also maintained a strong financial position. dividend stocks, financial performance, earnings, EPS, profit margin, consumer goods companies

Dividend history and payout ratio

A key factor for dividend investors is a company's dividend history. P&G and Kimberly-Clark have demonstrated their commitment to shareholders with consistent dividend payout records over the years. Investors look for companies with a stable dividend payout ratio, which indicates that a reasonable portion of earnings is distributed as dividends. An analysis of the historical dividend growth and payout ratio of both companies will provide valuable insights. dividend history, dividend payout ratio, dividend payouts, dividend growth, shareholder liability

Dividend yield and growth potential

A company's dividend yield is an important metric that shows the annual dividend as a percentage of the stock price. Investors often look for stocks with attractive dividend yields, which indicate the potential for regular income. Additionally, understanding the growth prospects of both companies will help investors assess their ability to maintain and increase their dividend payments in the future. dividend yield, dividend growth potential, share price, regular income, sustainable dividends

Market position and competitive advantage

Procter & Gamble and Kimberly-Clark are leaders in their respective markets, with significant market share and brand awareness. Examining their competitive advantages, market position and brand loyalty will give investors a clear picture of their long-term stability and growth potential. market position, competitive advantage, brand recognition, market share, brand loyalty

Global presence and economic conditions

As multinational companies, both P&G and Kimberly-Clark are exposed to different economic conditions around the world. Examining how these companies manage their global presence and manage economic challenges will allow investors to understand their resilience in uncertain times. multinational companies, global presence, economic conditions, resilience, uncertain times

 Both Procter & Gamble and Kimberly-Clark are strong candidates for dividend stocks with a proven track record of rewarding shareholders. Each company has its own unique strengths and advantages, so it is essential for investors to consider their individual investment objectives and risk tolerance.

Procter & Gamble's diverse portfolio of brands and robust financials position it as a stable performer, while Kimberly-Clark's strength in personal care and consumer tissues provides stability and growth potential.

Ultimately, choosing the better dividend stock between Procter & Gamble and Kimberly-Clark requires thorough research and analysis. Investors should focus on factors such as financial performance, dividend history, growth prospects, market position and global presence to make an informed decision tailored to their specific investment needs.